On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:45 AM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11 February 2014 18:40, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> String theory based on Maldacena's conjecture predicted the viscosity of >> the quark-gluon plasma before it was measured >> > > Correctly, I assume. >
More accurately than the classical prediction > > >> and more recently explained the mechanism behind EPR based on >> Einstein-Rosen bridges, which is more like a retrodiction. >> >>> > That seems like a sledgehammer to crack a nut, although the initials have > a nice near-symmetry. Why would one need to have ERBs - that presumably > have to be kept open by some exotic mechanicsm - to explain EPR when you > can do it very simply anyway? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
