On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Richard Ruquist <[email protected]> wrote:
> John, You need to read about the latest developments in string theory. > The sad fact is that there are no recent developments in string "theory" , and in fact in its entire history it only made one prediction that could be tested even theoretically and it turned out to be wrong, it predicted that there were 9 (or maybe 10 they're not sure) spacial dimensions; they had to invent all sorts of fudge factors and said that for no particular reason 6 (or maybe 7) of those extra dimensions are far too small to ever see. > Here is a link the the original Maldacena-Susskind 48 page paper > http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0533. > If they're right then the universe is non-local and I stand by what I said, both Einstein and Rosen would be appalled about how their bridge was used. And it still can't explain, as Everett could, how quantum particles seem to know when they are being observed. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
