On 13 Feb 2014, at 21:39, LizR wrote:
On 14 February 2014 08:56, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:
So no matter what is refuted we can save comp by saying that it is
true but at a lower level and what we have observed that appears to
refute comp is a dream or simulation at a higher level.
If this is true, comp isn't a scientific theory.
Correct.
But "this" is not true. "this" is already refuted in comp + theaetetus.
Of course the converse of this is that no matter what we observe
then it cannot confirm comp.
This is true of any scientific theory (if comp is one, therefore,
also true of comp).
Correct again.
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
