On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Platonist Guitar Cowboy wrote: > > While reading, do you get a sense that he points towards how this might > potentially weaken digital physics/functionalism in their strong sense? > That digital physics implies comp, which implies vast non computable parts > of reality, which rules out stronger forms of interpreting digital > physics/functionalism? Because in this quoted passage he just references > the teleportation ambiguity, as many have. I'd want to know if he dug a bit > deeper. PGC >
AFAICT, Tegmark has never acknowledged Bruno's result. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof Russell Standish Phone 0425 253119 (mobile) Principal, High Performance Coders Visiting Professor of Mathematics [email protected] University of New South Wales http://www.hpcoders.com.au ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
