On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:

> I came upon an interesting passage in "Our Mathematical Universe",
> starting on page 194, which I think members of this list might appreciate:
>
> "It gradually hit me that this illusion of randomness business really
> wasn't specific to quantum mechanics at all. Suppose that some future
> technology allows you to be cloned while you're sleeping, and that your two
> copies are placed in rooms numbered 0 and 1 (Figure 8.3). When they wake
> up, they'll both feel that the room number they read is completely
> unpredictable and random. If in the future, it becomes possible for you to
> upload your mind to a computer, then what I'm saying here will feel totally
> obvious and intuitive to you, since cloning yourself will be as easy as
> making a copy of your software. If you repeated the cloning experiment from
> Figure 8.3 many times and wrote down your room number each time, you'd in
> almost all cases find that the sequence of zeros and ones you'd written
> looked random, with zeros occurring about 50% of the time. In other words,
> causal physics will produce the illusion of randomness from your subjective
> viewpoint in any circumstance where you're being cloned. The fundamental
> reason that quantum mechanics appears random even though the wave function
> evolves deterministically is that the Schrodinger equation can evolve a
> wavefunction with a single you into one with clones of you in parallel
> universes. So how does it feel when you get cloned? It feels random! And
> every time something fundamentally random appears to happen to you, which
> couldn't have been predicted even in principle, it's a sign that you've
> been cloned."
>

While reading, do you get a sense that he points towards how this might
potentially weaken digital physics/functionalism in their strong sense?
That digital physics implies comp, which implies vast non computable parts
of reality, which rules out stronger forms of interpreting digital
physics/functionalism? Because in this quoted passage he just references
the teleportation ambiguity, as many have. I'd want to know if he dug a bit
deeper. PGC


>
> Jason
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to