Ghibbsa, I explain spin entanglement paradox this way:
When the particles are created their spins must already be equal and opposite orientations due to conservation. But this is true only in the mini spacetime which is defined by their conservation. That spacetime fragment is NOT LINKED to the spacetime alignments of the observer and laboratory. Thus because separate spacetimes can have no alignments with respect to each other, the spin alignment is still undetermined in the frame of the observer. Only when the spin alignment of one particle is measured do these separate spacetimes merge through that common event and at this point they are automatically aligned so the spin orientations of both particles are aligned in the frame of the lab. As soon as we understand that spacetime is not just a single universal common structure but actually consists of separate dynamic fragmentary spacetimes that need to be glued together by common events for alignments to resolve, then all quantum paradox is resolved because all quantum paradoxes seem paradoxical only with respect to the single common fixed universal spacetime MISTAKENLY ASSUMED. All quantum randomness arises because there can be no deterministic rules to align completely separate spacetime fragments, thus nature must act randomly to align them.. Edgar On Saturday, March 8, 2014 3:53:22 AM UTC-5, [email protected] wrote: > > > On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 3:18:50 PM UTC, Edgar L. Owen wrote: >> >> Jason, >> >> This initially interesting post of course exposes fundamental flaws in >> its logic and the way that a lot of people get mislead by physically >> impossible thought experiments such as the whole interminable p-clone, >> p-zombie discussion on this group. >> >> First there is of course no physical mechanism that continually produces >> clones and places them in separate rooms, nor is there any MW process that >> does that, so the whole analysis is moot, and frankly childish as it >> doesn't even take into consideration what aspects of reality change >> randomly and which don't. Specifically it's NOT room numbers that seem >> random, it's quantum level events. >> >> If anyone is looking for the source of quantum randomness I've already >> provided an explanation. It occurs as fragmentary spacetimes are created by >> quantum events and then merged via shared quantum events. There can be no >> deterministic rules for aligning separate spacetime fragments thus nature >> is forced to make those alignments randomly. >> >> But sadly no one on this group is interested in quantum theory, only >> relativity, and far out philosophies such as 'comp'. >> >> Edgar >> > > > Edgar, so how do you explain things like the two slit experiment and > entanglement with this theory? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
