On 28 Feb 2014, at 13:09, David Nyman wrote:
On 27 February 2014 21:35, Russell Standish <[email protected]>
wrote:
When I last took a look at constructor theory, it wasn't much of a
theory. I know David's been working on it, when he's not doing the
chat show circuit, but hadn't heard any major development in it
announced, so haven't taken another look. Do you have any papers on
it?
This is the most recent, I think:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.7439
He says the paper is "philosophical" rather than technical.
I agree on that. When scientists says this, it means they want to
abandon rigor and scientific method.
Might take closer look later, but if his point is correct, it should
be testable, and would probably refute comp or put our level in the
very very low. Or require a small physical universe, and an error in
MGA.
Bruno
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
