On 27 March 2014 20:12, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 Mar 2014, at 04:44, LizR wrote: > > I said that the "continuity is of exactly the same nature" (not that the > states were the same - in fact the states are successor states, as I > mentioned - which is something assumed to exist but still to be defined). > > I think that the successor states are well defined, in the 3p view, and i > the 1p view too, even if the domain of the 1p indeterlinacy is a complex > and highly non constructive notion. > > How does one define a successor state, or states? (I would guess as a state that has a most recent memory of the preceeding state, perhaps?)
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
