Then it is really a conjecture

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> 2014-03-25 22:34 GMT+01:00 Richard Ruquist <[email protected]>:
>
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Quentin Anciaux <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-03-25 21:37 GMT+01:00 Richard Ruquist <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 24 Mar 2014, at 20:18, Richard Ruquist wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruno,
>>>>>
>>>>> How does cloning differ from "asking the doctor".
>>>>> Forgive me but it seems that you are being contradictory-
>>>>> just to indicate that this is an important question.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No problem: I love all questions :)
>>>>>
>>>>> The non cloning theorem says that you cannot copy exactly a *quantum
>>>>> state*. Note that you can still teleport it quantum mechanically, but you
>>>>> have to detsroy "the original".
>>>>>
>>>>> But nobody pretends that your mind needs your exact quantum state. It
>>>>> needs only a substitution level, which is usually estimate to be at a 
>>>>> quite
>>>>> higher level than the quantum state.
>>>>>
>>>>> You cannot clone this or that exemplary of "Alice in Wonderland", but
>>>>> it is easy to make a copy of its classical information content, which is
>>>>> way above the quantum level defining the "material" book.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruno, My concern is at what level is consciousness. I suspect that if
>>>> it is below the substitution level, then consciousness will not be
>>>> transmitted
>>>>
>>>
>>> Consciousness is always *at* the substitution level by definition of
>>> what is a "substitution level"... the definition of the substitution level
>>> is the level at which your consciousness is invariant (you don't feel a
>>> change) if implemented on a "digital brain"/computer... so by definition
>>> your consciousness is preserved at the substitution level as low it can
>>> be... (and it exists if computationalism is true...).
>>>
>> "Consciousness is Invariant at the Substitution level"
>> Sounds like a theorem. Can you link me to its proof?
>>
>
> It's a definition, it doesn't need a proof.
>
> Quentin
>
>
>> Richard
>>
>>>
>>> Quentin
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> All the same with this present post. Once send it will be multiplied,
>>>>> without any information loss, to all participant to this forum.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right, except that I suspect that the post is not conscious.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Now, I should add that the consequence of comp remains correct, even
>>>>> if our substitution level is sub quantum, and asks for the total quantum
>>>>> state. WHY? because the consequences depends only on step 7, which does 
>>>>> not
>>>>> use any duplication of any states, but only their multi-preparation, which
>>>>> is done automatically by the arithmetical reality, or the Universal
>>>>> Dovetailer. Only the pedagogical step 1-6 are no more available except ...
>>>>> as pedagogical steps. But a majority of people believe that the brain,
>>>>> although plausibly a quantum object, works at a much higher level, so I
>>>>> don't insist so much on this, given that we get a non-cloning result
>>>>> directly by comp.
>>>>>
>>>>> OK?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Right, and I suspect that consciousness could be duplicated
>>>> if the consciousness level is at or above the substitution level.
>>>>  Seems we have several levels:
>>>> the particle and quantum levels, and the consciousness and the
>>>> substitution level, The conscious level is fixed by nature.
>>>> The substitution level seems to be fixed by mathematics.
>>>> They both may be the same: nature and math, that is.
>>>> Richard
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bruno
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 24 Mar 2014, at 00:43, Joseph Knight wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruno, I've seen you say before that COMP (in addition to the
>>>>>> first-person indeterminacy) also predicts the no-cloning theorem. Could 
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> explain how?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a purely qualitative way, that should be easy, if you succeed in
>>>>>> staying naive-cold with the UDA up to step 7. Imagine that I decide to 
>>>>>> copy
>>>>>> a piece of matter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unlike information, where things are crisp at some point, it is
>>>>>> already not clear what is the relevant level, so an exact copy should be
>>>>>> defined by something like a non distinguishability with respect to some 
>>>>>> set
>>>>>> of instruments.
>>>>>> Anyway, at some point, in your zooming toward finer and finer
>>>>>> description of the piece of matter, you arrive at your own substitution
>>>>>> level. At that level, the matter is no more made of subpart, but is
>>>>>> undetermined, as you comp state is no more dependent of such details, and
>>>>>> *you* diffuse on all the possible "subcomputations", where, by the FPI, 
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> universal machines are somehow in competition (by the invariance of the 
>>>>>> 1p
>>>>>> for the "length of the proof of the sigma_1 proposition, or 
>>>>>> computations).
>>>>>> How could you clone that? We cannot clone an object, because an object is
>>>>>> not a real thing, but an information pattern, which becomes necessarily
>>>>>> fuzzy when we look at it below the substitution level. What we can see
>>>>>> there is only an average of the many possible computations below our 
>>>>>> (first
>>>>>> person plural) substitution level.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bruno
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Fabric of Alternate Reality" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/foar.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
>>> Batty/Rutger Hauer)
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. (Roy
> Batty/Rutger Hauer)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to