On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 5:06 PM, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Chris de Morsella 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>>  Me: OK  I'm going to go over this one more time very slowly and I'll
>>> try not to use too many big words. First let's assume that solar cells work
>>> 5 times better than they really do and the capacity factor is 1 instead of
>>> .2, then worldwide solar cells would produce 1.5*10^11 watts of POWER. And
>>> in one hour PV would produce 1.5*10^11 watt-hours of ENERGY. And in one
>>> year it would produce 365*24 = 8760 times that much or 1.3*10^15 watt-hours
>>> of ENERGY. And now lets see how much POWER would be required to run human
>>> technology, it's 1.5 *10^17 watts of POWER. And to run it for one hour
>>> would require 1.5*10^17 watt-hours of ENERGY. And to run it for one year
>>> would require 365*24 = 8760 times that much or 1.3*10^21 watt-hours of
>>> ENERGY.
>>>
>>
John,

Looking here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption

It seems that 1.5 * 10^17 is the total energy consumption of humanity in
watt-hours per year, not the power required. So the power required would be
almost 4 orders of magnitude smaller than what you assume (divide by 8760).
No?

Telmo.


> Now let's work on findings percentages. A percentage is a pure number with
>>> no units and ENERGY and POWER have different units, so you can't divide
>>> ENERGY by POWER as you did and expect to get anything meaningful, but you
>>> can divide POWER by POWER and if you divide 1.5*10^11 watts of POWER by 1.5
>>> *10^17 watts of POWER you get the pure number .000001. Or you could divide
>>> the amount of ENERGY solar cells produce in one hour, 1.5*10^11 watt-hours
>>> by the amount of ENERGY required to operate technology for one hour
>>> 1.5*10^17 watt-hours of ENERGY, and we still get the pure number .000001.
>>> Or you could divide the amount of ENERGY solar cells produce in one year,
>>> 1.3*10^15 watt-hours of ENERGY, by the amount of ENERGY required to operate
>>> technology for one year, 1.3*10^21 watt-hours of ENERGY, and we STILL get
>>> the pure number .000001 And that is why I originally said photovoltaics
>>> provide .0001% of demand. However you said that in the real world solar
>>> cells are much worse than that and the capacity factor is not 1 but is .2,
>>> and that seems about right to me, so they only produce 20% of the POWER and
>>> 20% of the ENERGY that I used in the above calculation, therefore
>>> photovoltaics really only provide .00002% of what is required to run the
>>> world.
>>>
>>
>>  > You: John you are so full of yourself that you cannot admit you
>> mistook capacity for output
>>
>
> Chris, 4 or 5 posts ago it became obvious to me that you are a ignoramus,
> your total confusion between power and energy and your bizarre belief that
> solar cells are better if they have a 20% conversion factor than if they
> had a 100% conversion factor could lead to no other conclusion. However
> being a ignoramus is not necessarily a devastating state to be in because
> sometimes ignorance is curable; but more recently it became clear that you
> are also incapable of learning, or at least learn at such a slow rate it is
> unmeasurable by me. And unfortunately at the present day medical science
> has no cure for stupid.
>
>   John K Clark
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to