On 5/28/2014 12:35 AM, LizR wrote:
On 28 May 2014 16:20, meekerdb <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 5/27/2014 7:36 PM, LizR wrote:
    On 28 May 2014 14:12, <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:24:39 AM UTC+1, Liz R wrote:

            As far as I can see Bruno has a logical argument which happens to 
segue
            into a theory of physics. To disprove it, one merely needs to show 
that
            either his premises or his argument is wrong...


        I don't agree with you about that, but for point of order, I haven't 
gone down
        that road anyway. He's wrong about falsification. I did try to drop it. 
I shall
        probably try again.

    Bruno may well be wrong about falsification. I haven't tried to follow the
    arguments you and he have had on the subject, or not very much. I know 
Bruno has
    said he does have a theory of everything, which is subject to 
falsification...
    which it seems to me is an awful lot to derive from the idea that 
consciousness
    arises from computation
    I think the more crucial step is arguing that computation (and therefore
    consciousness) can exist without physics.  That physical instantiation is 
dispensable.


Yes indeed. I would say that for comp to be meaningful, it's necessary to show that information is a real (and fundamental) thing, rather than something that only has relevance / meaning to us - I suppose deriving the entropy of a black hole, the Beckenstein bound and the holographic principle all hint that this is the case. (Maybe QM unitarity and the black hole information paradox too?)

I'm not sure how secure a footing any of these items put the "reification of information" it on, though.

As Bruno has noted, we live on border between order and chaos - neither maximum nor minimum information/entropy but something like "complexity". Here's recent survey of ways to quantify it by Scott Aaronso, Sean Carroll and Lauren Ouellette. http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1818

Brent


If that /is/ established, then I guess comp becomes one potential route to derive "it from bit".

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to