On 10 June 2014 16:16, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Russell Standish <[email protected]> > wrote: > Perhaps if the simulation argument is true, and some fraction of our >> explanations are simulated realities, and a larger fraction of these >> simulated realities contain wish-granting-subroutines than those that >> contain wish-denying subroutines, then it might offer some explanation for >> purported statistical biases when humans try to use their will to effect >> random number generators (and similar phenomena). These could also be >> third-person observable so long as multiple people are contained within the >> same simulation. >> > > If this phenomenon really exists it would be evidence for comp, then? (but only evidence for the 1p view, like quantum suicide) ???
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
