On 6/26/2014 7:58 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Jun 2014, at 18:23, John Clark wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> In Brussels, the atheists claims that agnostics are atheists, but this
can only
create a confusion.
Concerning the existence of a china teapot in orbit around the planet Uranus, are you a
teapot atheist or agnostic?
Agnostic. You never know. I agree that with such a teapot, and what I believe, I would
say that it highly non plausible.
Yet your analogy does not work, because the notion of god is not that clear-cut.
Exactly what I said, that your distinction between atheist and agnostic,
/I make clear what I mean by agnostic (~[] g) and atheists ([]~g). Natural language
confuse easily ~[] and []~. Modal logic is useful if only to explain that difference./
was to simplistic, because it depends on the meaning of "g".
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
