On 7/13/2014 11:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Then, look at my preceding post to you. I don't know for Tegmark, but computationalism
excels in differentiating and relating the different sort of existence: ontological,
epistemological, observational, communicable or not, theological, etc.
Lists like this that subscribe to everythingism Bruno's "comp" and Tegmark's MUH
completely erase the boundary between math and physics.
On the contrary, Comp introduces a clear distinction between the physical, core of all
universal being, and the geographical, which are the contingencies of the normal
universal numbers living above their substitution level.
Physics is done today is just fuzzy about such distinction.
That would be a nice result. How does it differentiate different sorts
existence?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
