On 12 August 2014 15:12, meekerdb <[email protected]> wrote:

>  A makes decisions in response to the world.  Although, ex hypothesi, the
> world is repeating its inputs and A is repeating his decisions.
>

(I assume you mean B is repeating?)


> Note that this assumes QM doesn't apply at the computational level of A.
>

Well, I guess a physical UD would be made robust against quantum
uncertainty, like all computers, but why do we need to assume QM apply?


> In the argument we're asked to consider a dream so that we're led to
> overlook the fact that the meaning of A's internal processes actually
> derive from A's interaction with a world.
>

This is what I don't see. Why do A's internal processes have meaning, while
B's don't - given that they're physically identical?

> Or at least I remember Bruno saying that the substitution level and region
> to be emulated weren't important to the argument, as long as there is some
> level and region in which it holds. I'm sure he said that it might involve
> emulating the world, or a chunk of the universe, but that the argument
> still goes through.
>
>  Or did I misremember that, or did he say that, but there's a flaw in his
> argument?
>
> It's not exactly a flaw.  He always says, sure just make the simulation
> more comprehensive, include more of the environment, even the whole
> universe.  Which is OK, but then when you think about the reversal of
> physics and psychology you see that it is the physics here, in the
> non-simulated world, which has been replaced by the psychology PLUS physics
> in the simulated world.  If I say I can replace you with a simulation -
> I'll probably be greeted with skepticism.  But if I say I can replace you
> with a simulation of you in a simulation of the world - well then it's not
> so clear what I mean or how hard it will be.
>

I'm not sure I follow you here. Why does making the simulation bigger
invalidate the argument? Is there a cut-off point?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to