On 9/23/2014 1:46 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
This is isn't necessarily wrong, but as an argument it leaves a big gap.
You might elaborate. There is an unavoidable gap about consciousness, but if you accept
the definition and computationalism, the gap is entirely explained, indeed by the G*
minus G non-empty annulus and its intensional variants. But may be you allude to some
other gap, in which case I would be happy to make it more precise.
I don't refer to the unavoidable gap, but to the gap between having an inner narrative and
being able to do universal computation. I don't see entailment in either direction.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
