On 13 November 2014 06:46, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 Nov 2014, at 16:10, Peter Sas wrote: > > Does anybody know this paper: > http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221268641300037X > > > It is pleasant to read, but I will wait what others can add, if it is > really more than a variant of the vacuum fluctuation approach. > > It cannot satisfy a theorician of mind, who assumes the computationalist > hypothesis, because it assumes: > > 1) the quantum description of the physical reality, > 2) a primary physical reality. >
I will try to have a look but you just bumped it down my reading list. It sounds like it starts off already high up the ontological tree and hence isn't really addressing what it claims to (Also, anything on CEN which doesn't mention ToN in the credits is off to a bad start, IMHO). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
