On 05 Dec 2014, at 05:05, LizR wrote:
I suspect that Bruno is differentiating physical existence from
primary existence.
Absolutely. This comes from the UDA (Universal Dovetailer Argument).
Something exist physically if you can bet on it with a probability one
in the arithmetical multiplication experience (the global FPI on
arithmetic).
This works only if the probability one, i.e. []p & <>t, admits a
quantization, so that we have a "phase space" (in the logician sense
of a symmetric and reflexive structure). It happens that we do recover
such structure (that was the math part of my thesis).
This leads to many open problem, with the hope of getting what we need
to have space (coming from the graded aspect of the material
hypostases).
In fact all []^n & <>^m t gives an abstract quantum logic when n is
least or equal to m, (with []^n p = [][][]...[] p), and from this I
expect some Temperley-Lieb algebra which should provide the "physical
space" in which we can derive the rest of physics in a manner similar
to Noether (like in Stenger book).
Bruno
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
