On 31 Dec 2014, at 20:12, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:



From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected] ] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 5:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Democracy


On 30 Dec 2014, at 01:38, 'Chris de Morsella' via Everything List wrote:





----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]>
To: everything-list <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: Democracy

>>The Soviet union can be formally considered a "democracy". There is nothing external or formal that may distinguish a democracy from any other regime. Since every modern state has the same elements. All of them use the momenclature of the age. The word democracy is the most overused world in this century togeter with "scientific".

No word comes close to matching the overuse of the word "god" however.


Yes,  ... and no.

For the greeks "God" was just a pointer to the truth we are searching, through theories and observation. It led to math and physics, + inquiry about which one is more fundamental, and what might still be beyond math and physics. That use of God remains in some language expression, like when we say "only God knows", which means "I don't know".

But that is how the word was used in the Hellenistic period; I was referring to modern usage that has associated it with a monotheistic value system.

Which comes from the ONE of the greeks, mixed with the Jewish legend. Well, if you forget the superstition, it has some important relation. Monotheism is a reflexion of parmenides or Plotinus monism.




A few examples “a God fearing” man (or woman) is upstanding, moral and considered (by other god-fearers at least) to be superior to those who do not fear god;


With some definition, fearing God is a nonsense. We should fear the devil, but not God. But of course this aspect of the thing is not yet retrieved from arithmetic. I hipe it will, but I am not 100% sure. Open problem. How much can e say that god is good, like Plato thought? We don't know yet.





whilst by comparison describing a person as being godless is usually a form of ad hominem insult. A Godless person is assumed to be (by the God-fearing sheeple) of lower moral caliber and someone who cannot be trusted.

I can make sense. No one is Godless. Godless people confuse God and some hero of fairy tale.



God is a word that may have meant something to the people of Hellenistic Mediterranean basin, but the word symbol has become highly loaded with value judgment during the era of the prevalence of the three Abrahamic cults of monotheism (and perhaps earlier even with Persian Zoroastrianism the mother monotheist religion that gave birth to the later usurper Abrahamic faiths that violently supplanted it for the most part.)

Like the star were Gods, but we know better, and adapt the vocabulary. If not we sustain the dogma in the field, and, as we can see in my case, we stop the progress.



It is hard to change the common usage of a word as deeply embedded in a given matrix of meaning as the word God (with a capital ‘G’) has become in the three Abrahamic monotheistic cultures. Wouldn’t it be better to invent a new word – unsaddled by all that Abrahamic baggage – to describe that which ancient Greek philosophers were describing when they used this word?

Why? They use it before, and the main attribute of God is that it has no name, so it is good to use the substantive instead. Creating a new name automatically will make us believe that the name is important, and so would be gravely misleading. It would make more complex the comparison. During a period, I use "One" in the place of "God". This led people to believe that I was advertising for Plotinus in a misleading way. God is the very general term. Just look at "God" in the wikis, you will see that the same term "god" is used in quite different meaning, which is useful when doing science, as we must be neutral since the start.

When I presented my thesis in France, I suppress all "religious" name, but the atheists were still saying the same bs on it.

Let us just keep the scientific attitude, and let us try to go beyond the vocabulary issue. The monotheistic theologians are, in general, less wrong than the atheists on even the God of the machine. (That is what makes some strong-atheists nervous, but it is just because they cannot say "I was wrong").

Bruno



-Chris

Then, when the science "theology" has been recuperated by politics, and when religion get institutionalized, the term God has become the name of some hero in some fairy tale, and the science behind has been put under the rug, and is still taboo today (which I can understand for the Church's employee, but not for the atheists, which should on the contrary be open to the coming back to reason in that field. Eventually I conclude that atheism is *really* the religious mirror of christianity. They have the same notion of God (even if it is used only to be denied) and they have the same notion of primary matter (modulo some details).

So God is both not enough used (it means the unknown fundamental reality, simply) and overused (idolatry, blasphems, argument by terror (like with hell), etc.).


Bruno



-Chris

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to