2014-12-30 14:15 GMT+01:00 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>:

>
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 19:27, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
>
> The Soviet union can be formally considered a "democracy".
>
>
>
>
> I disagree. Democracy is when there are election, with secret vote, every
> four or five years. It allows a formal opposition with some representation
> is some parliament or equivalent.
>

The soviet union had elections and a other parties. It had a parliament .
At least in most of the comunist parties there were a "formal" opposition.
The constitution of the URSS was ok according to liberal standards. All
that you mentioned were meet as well as it is met by almost every modern
regime


>
>
>
>
> http://books.google.es/books?id=kNfBCKFB8WMC&printsec=frontcover&hl=es#v=onepage&q=soviet&f=false
>
>
> By looking for a true universal classification for political regimes, It
> is necessary to raise the level of analysis to metaphysics and theology,
> since definitions need to be more and more abstract and precise at the same
> time. There is no way to use the external (formal) neither the internal
> (self reported) data.
>
> Basically the only possible forms of governments are the ones defined by
> the greek phylosophers.
>
>
> Actually I disagree on this, despite my appreciation of the greeks
> philosophers. Plato, and even Plotinus, tried to implement cities governed
> by "sage", but this does not work. Cities are better governed by
> opportunist egoists, hoping they are clever enough to take into account the
> suggestion of the people (if only to be reelected later).
>
>
>
>
> There is no others possible. The names used in each age vary depending on
> the ideologies that support the state, but that does not change the
> underlying nature. And the ideology that support the legitimacy of the
> regime is a form or religion.  That is in what is based the branch of
> political theory called political theology, the deepest branch.
>
>
>
> In machine's theology, invoking religion in politics is already a
> blasphem.
>
> Theology cannot be political, no more than physics or biology. Politicians
> can take into acoount their beliefs and faith, but not in a public way.
> Democracy separates religion and state.
>
>
>
>
>
>  Marxism is close to Islam.
>
>
> I do agree with this, with Islamism instead of Islam. I am astonished how
> much the leftists defend the fanatical Islamists and even the antisemites
> and the antichristians, those days.
>
>
>
> And The soviet Union close to an oriental empire with the King-Priest that
> has the unique power to interpret the true meaning of history.
>
>
> Yes. But that shows how much it is not democratic. Russia has made
> progress though. More than we realize in West Europa. But they have still
> big progress to do. In the West, we have regressed a lot, and the more I
> study how and why, the more I link this to prohibition.
>
> Exercise:
> 5 years of prohibition of alcohol has given Al Capone.
> What has given 75 years of prohibition of cannabis?
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
> 2014-12-28 11:57 GMT+01:00 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]>:
>
>>
>> On 27 Dec 2014, at 23:40, Kim Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 27 Dec 2014, at 11:44 pm, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>  On 27 Dec 2014, at 03:11, Kim Jones wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Democracy is a concept. It can be implemented in various ways. I like
>>>>> Liz's conceptualisation of it as communist-style sharing of astcronomical
>>>>> wealth and resources among the elites with cockroaches and urine for
>>>>> breakfast for the rest of us (that's what prisoners in North Korea get
>>>>> given for breakfast according to QC Geoffrey Robertson.) No one who gets
>>>>> jugged hare and Beluga caviar for lunch around Pyongyang feels like they
>>>>> exist in anything other than a perfect democracy.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bruno: I doubt this. I am sure that all dictator knows pretty well that
>>>> they are not in a democracy. They fight democracy by all means.
>>>>
>>>
>>> So why do they call this place "The  DEMOCRATIC  People's Republic of
>>> Korea (DPRK) ?? Is this some kind of joke or insincere label?
>>>
>>
>> Typical insincere label of a non-democracy. By democracy I think it is
>> usually meant that people can vote, regularly, with a representation of
>> opposition party, and some level of education (without which voting does
>> not really work).
>> The secret of the vote is imperative. Voting with hands does not count
>> (for obvious reason).
>>
>>
>>
>>> Oh, that's right - they have simply misunderstood the true nature of
>>> democracy, because they don't subscribe to this list, silly me.
>>>
>>
>> ?
>> We might have a problem of definition. I think it is just the definition
>> of the term. Democracy is just when we have the right to vote.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> They have defined "democracy" the way they choose; just as does every
>>> country who finds this a useful concept. As I said: democracy is a concept
>>> and concepts have many many ways of being implemented or delivered.
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure. Democracy is mainly the right of voting. The east european
>> countries could not, before the Berlin wall felt, and are democracies
>> after. Tunisia, Egypt, even Russia are doing step toward a representative
>> democracy, which obviously is hard to implement due to the conflicts of
>> interest.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Clearly, the trick they employ in the DPRK is to define "the people"
>>> differently to other countries. That something like two-thirds of the
>>> "population" of the DPRK don't even officially exist (ie no birth record
>>> kept) appears to be the magic trick.
>>>
>>
>> The DPRK is not a democracy at all. Nobody would believe it is a
>> democracy, not even the leader Kim, except for some tyrannic purpose.
>>
>>
>>> The kernel concept of democracy is government by the majority.
>>>
>>
>> Not always. This is complex according to the number of party. With
>> multi-partism, sometimes we are governed by a tiny party which can
>> influence between two bigger parties which are close to 50%. That is the
>> case in my country now: we are governed by a party which is not
>> representative of the majority. In Israel also, very often, little minority
>> parties get a lot of power. This is the main reason why I favor bi-partism,
>> although this has some problem too. If the politics go too much on the
>> right, you can vote on the left, and vice-versa. This works, unless the
>> parties are manipulated by non transparent powers, like in America today,
>> at least for for some political questions. This is a failure of a sick and
>> old democracy. We can think about how to correct that, but democracies,
>> like living being, are fragile by nature. They can die, like in Germany in
>> the thirties.
>>
>>
>>  So, all you have to do to have a workable majority is to erase a
>>> sizeable part of the population.
>>>
>>> VoilĂ . Government for and by the majority.
>>>
>>
>>
>> If the majority is erased or impeach to vote, the democracy is faked. You
>> cannot criticize the heart by pointing on people having heart disease.
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> K
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alberto.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Alberto.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to