On 1/17/2015 2:02 AM, Jason Resch wrote:


On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:46 PM, meekerdb <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 1/15/2015 8:31 PM, Kim Jones wrote:



    On 16 Jan 2015, at 5:18 am, meekerdb <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    On 1/15/2015 3:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
    It is the reason why I stopped, a long time ago, to qualify myself as an 
atheist.
    I realized that atheists believe to much in the christian God, 
paradoxically enough.

    By your logic one cannot disbelieve in anything because to do so you have to
    conceive of what it is your are failing to believe (otherwise you don't 
know what
    you're talking about);


    Well, yes. Of course you have to be able to conceive of what you are going 
to make
    a choice to believe in or not! Implying that you "have the right" to 
disbelieve in
    something you cannot conceive of is the height of sophistry. You are merely
    testifying to the limitation of your own, or of human imagination but that 
is
    precisely the terrain we are treading here: the interface of human 
ignorance with
    what is really real.

    Of course the human imagination cannot conceive of God the way God is. This 
is
    because WE ARE ALL THE EYES AND EARS OF GOD. The eye cannot see itself. The 
hammer
    cannot hit itself. It can only infer it's true nature using the imagination 
and
    HOPE that the description adopted is exact. It never is. We cannot know 
what or who
    we are. It's a pretty miserable state of affairs, particularly if you are a
    hard-nosed scientist, I gather.

    Hard-nosed scientists are inured to not knowing things.  It's mystics who 
insist on
    making up an answer because they are uncomfortable with uncertainty.


"Not knowing"

a- (not)
-gnostic (know)
If scientists are inured to not knowing, why not consider yourself agnostic?

"Agnostic" is a broad term. You can be agnostic about almost any question. People mean so many different things by "God" to say one is agnostic about the existence of God is virtually meaningless. But to say you are an atheist is fairly specific, one who doesn't believe the theist god exists. So, if asked, I could say I'm agnostic, but what would I be agnostic about. I wouldn't be agnostic about the god of Abraham (which is how it's likely to be understood in the U.S.). What would you mean if you said you were an agnostic?

Brent

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to