On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you define increased intelligence as decreased probability of having a > false belief on any randomly chosen proposition, then superintelligences > will be wrong on almost nothing, Not for a finite intelligence because some problems can be infinitely hard. And if there is simply a lack of information more intelligence will not produce a better answer ( when Shakespeare went to the King Edward V1 Grammar School at age 7 what was the name of his teacher?) >Therefore nearly all superintelligences will operate according to the same > belief system. There is no correlation between intelligence and maters of taste, it is not more intelligent to prefer brussels sprouts over creamed corn or Bach over Beethoven. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
