On 11 February 2015 at 17:37, Samiya Illias <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 11-Feb-2015, at 6:40 am, John Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 Alberto G. Corona <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I can´t even enumerate the number of ways in which that article is wrong. > > > I stopped reading after the following parochial imbecility "I don't see > Christ's redemption limited to human beings". > > > First of all, any intelligent robot MUST have a religion in order to act >> in any way. > > > Yet another example of somebody in love with the English word "religion" > but not with the meaning behind it. > > >> > But I think that a robot with such level of intelligence will never be >> possible > > > So you think that random mutation and natural selection can produce a > intelligent being but a intelligent designer can't. Why? > > I am so happy to read this comment of yours. I hope someday you'll come to > reason that even we have been produced by an intelligent designer. > I often learn new details of just how unintelligently designed I am from my doctor. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
