On 2/12/2015 8:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Yes it does assume an unexplainable first intelligence. However, the unexplainable is
simply because of our lack of knowledge of that. The absence of an intelligent designer
is more illogical. It's just filling the gap with nothing.
Hmm....
What if we fill the gap with elementary arithmetic?
What if we leave the gap with "We don't know" until we have more knowledge.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
