Liz: any idea what - MASS - anad - ENRGY- 'may' be? (not from the equational recourses based on the supposition of their 'existence' in science!) JM
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:05 PM, LizR <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17 February 2015 at 09:50, John Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This may seem off the subject, but conservation of mass-energy must not >> be correct, otherwise our Universe could not have become so large (in terms >> of both *mass and energy)*. >> >> >> > I believe this is true. Mass-energy isn't conserved on cosmological scales > by universes obeying general relativity. > > >> As an example the quark model presumes that there are neutrons in the >> nuclei of stable atoms. But neutrons have a half-life to 10.23 minutes. >> > > This is explained by the Pauli exclusion principle - see > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron#Bound_neutron_decay > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
