Liz: any idea what - MASS - anad - ENRGY- 'may' be? (not from the equational recourses based on the supposition of their 'existence' in science!) JM
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:05 PM, LizR <lizj...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 17 February 2015 at 09:50, John Ross <jr...@trexenterprises.com> wrote: > >> This may seem off the subject, but conservation of mass-energy must not >> be correct, otherwise our Universe could not have become so large (in terms >> of both *mass and energy)*. >> >> >> > I believe this is true. Mass-energy isn't conserved on cosmological scales > by universes obeying general relativity. > > >> As an example the quark model presumes that there are neutrons in the >> nuclei of stable atoms. But neutrons have a half-life to 10.23 minutes. >> > > This is explained by the Pauli exclusion principle - see > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron#Bound_neutron_decay > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
