Read the rest of the sentence. It makes a difference. On 23 Jun 2015 4:45 pm, "John Clark" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:59 AM, David Nyman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In other words, any ToM that proceeds from physics as a given struggles >> to explain precisely how a non-conscious system would be different > > > Struggles?? The answer is obvious, a non-conscious system would be stupid > and a conscious system would not be. If Darwin was correct that MUST be > true otherwise there would be no reason for random mutation and natural > selection to have produced a conscious being, and we all know > with absolute certainty that it did at least once and probably many > billions of times. > > John K Clark > > > > >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
