On 9/8/2015 4:14 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:


On 8 September 2015 at 20:48, Bruce Kellett <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:

    On 8/09/2015 8:40 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:

    On 8 September 2015 at 17:39, Bruce Kellett
    <bhkell...@optusnet.com.au <mailto:bhkell...@optusnet.com.au>> wrote:

        On 8/09/2015 4:56 pm, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
        I will ask you the same question as I did Brent: do you
        conclude from the fact that when you toss a coin it comes up
        either as head or tails that the world does not split into
        two parallel versions of you, one of which sees heads and
        the other tails?
        I would conclude that a coin toss does not provide any
        evidence for multiple worlds or a split. The only evidence we
        have from this data is that the outcome of the toss is
        uncertain. There is no evidence there for any split of anything.


    It is not evidence FOR a split but is it evidence AGAINST a split?

    It is evidence that the assumption of a split is not necessary in
    order to understand everyday happenings. So, by the application of
    Occam's Razor, no split happens.


So you agree that we would still observe the probabilities we do if we lived in a deterministic world in whaich all possibilities are realised?

It's more complicated than that; possibilities aren't the same as probabilities. Probabilities are real numbers so we need an infinite splitting and a measure on the splits.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to