On 10/27/2015 12:10 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:


On 27 October 2015 at 17:32, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 10/26/2015 2:16 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:


    On Tuesday, 27 October 2015, John Clark <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        Russell Standish wrote:

            Modus ponens is only a formal manipulation of symbols,
            with no semantic content.



        ​ I agree.​

        Stathis Papaioannou
        ​ Wrote:​


            This is an argument John Searle has made.


        ​ Unfortunately yes.​

            The problem is, the brain can also be described as
            manipulating symbols with no semantic content


        ​Yes.​

            ​ > ​
            so where does semantic content come from?


        ​From examples in the physical world. You can give as many
        botanical definitions of the word  "tree" as you want but it
        will just be a word defined by other words that are
        themselves defined by yet more words that are.... If you
        tried to dig for meaning all you'd find is a endless loop, it
        would just be a game where words are manipulated according to
        the rules of botany until somebody forgot about definitions
        and pointed to the ​ASCII string "t-r-e-e" and then pointed
        to a large photosynthesizing organism made largely of
        cellulose that exists in the physical world. Then even a
        martian would notice a correspondence between this game of
        manipulating symbols called "botany" that humans had invented
        and the way these large photosynthesizing organism made
        largely of cellulose live.


    What about a virtual world with trees and observers, and no I/O
    devices connecting it to outside trees?

    The observer's use of the word "tree" would have the semantic
    content of referring to a (virtual) tree.


In effect, intrinsically meaningless symbols would bootstrap themselves into being meaningful, without reference to outside reality.

Sure. Do you think the meaning you assign to "tree" requires some supernatural reality above and beyond the existence of trees in this world. It's not that there were meaningless symbols and then they did something to become meaningful. They were invented to convey meaning about things that were already observed.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to