On 14 Apr 2016, at 18:58, John Clark wrote:

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016  Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:

​> ​determinisme and locality entails from the (sharable first person plural)

​I don't know what "sharable first person plura​l" means.







Instead of duplication or superposition of a person, we consider duplication of a population of person. Think of you and me going in the Helsinki/Washington-Moscow device. Or think about quantum mechanics, where entanglement = sharing a superposition.

In that case the indeterminacy is sharable (among the people from the population). They can bet on the results and they can define the probabilities with the Deutsch book method, that is, without the definition based on frequency. Some people uses this to avoid probability theory and use some decision theoretic tools instead. It works both fro the classical computationalist duplication case and quantum self-superposition.



If I'm falling into a Black Hole and you're far away observing me through a telescope you will NEVER see me go through the event horizon, but from my viewpoint in a finite amount of time (and not even a very long time) I will go through the event horizon without incident. Both viewpoints are equally valid but they can not be shared; you can see one or the other but not both.

Good illustration which illustrates that you got the point.


​> ​point of view of each observer in the multiverse things looks indeterminate and non local,

​Yes.​

​> ​but nowhere is there any action at a distance, nor any indeterminacy or event without "cause".

​That would only be true from the viewpoint of somebody standing outside of the multiverse looking back in at it, and that is a viewpoint that can not exist because there is no place​ outside of the multiverse and thus no place​ to stand. So you're talking about what ​it would be like if impossible things ​could happen​ ,​ ​and that can be entertaining (I like the Harry Potter books) but it's not science.


You don't need to stand outside the universe when you do theoretical physics. You can define the universe by some solution of some equation (like in Einstein's GR, or Dewitt-Wheeler equation, etc.).

Bruno





 John K Clark






--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to