On Sun, Apr 17, 2016  Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
.

> ​>> ​
>> ​It's not just that you don't have to, you CAN'T do ​theoretical physics
>> ​ from a viewpoint that CAN NOT EXIST because the result would be
>> ridiculous and useless.
>>
>
> ​>​
> It does not exist physically, but it can still exist mathematically,
> logically, etc.
>

​If the multiverse contains everything that there is then there is nothing
logical about talking about what things would look like
​for somebody standing
outside the multiverse looking back at it.
​ It's a
ridiculous
​waste of time, a complete dead end.​

​>> ​
>> if you start with a unphysical premise then you will reach a unphysical
>> conclusion and that does neither mathematicians nor physicists any good.
>
>
> ​> ​
> That would make disappear a lot of thought experience which have play an
> important role in the advance in physics (in Galilee, Einstein, Maxwell,
> etc.).
>

If the works of
​
Galilee, Einstein
​
or
​
Maxwell
​
were built on unphysical foundation
​s​
then today nobody would remember their names, instead they are among the
most
​famous​
 physicists of all time. In fact Einstein came up with relativity by trying
to imagine what the viewpoint would be of somebody moving at the speed of
light and
​​
discovered that viewpoint would produce logical contradictions
​,​
and therefore CAN NOT EXIST.

​ John K Clark​

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to