On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote: > > determinisme and locality entails from the (sharable first person plural) >
I don't know what "s harable first person plura l" means. If I'm falling into a Black Hole and you're far away observing me through a telescope you will NEVER see me go through the event horizon, but from my viewpoint in a finite amount of time (and not even a very long time) I will go through the event horizon without incident. Both viewpoints are equally valid but they can not be shared; you can see one or the other but not both. > > > point of view of each observer in the multiverse things looks > indeterminate and non local, > Yes. > > > but nowhere is there any action at a distance, nor any indeterminacy or > event without "cause". > That would only be true from the viewpoint of somebody standing outside of the multiverse looking back in at it, and that is a viewpoint that can not exist because there is no place outside of the multiverse and thus no place to stand. So you're talking about what it would be like if impossible things could happen , and that can be entertaining (I like the Harry Potter books) but it's not science. John K Clark > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
