On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> I would say it would have to have *SOMETHING* physical as we know it or >> it wouldn't be another physical universe as we know it. >> > > > > So according to you, does every physical universe has to have hadrons, > electrons and photons, and 3 spatial dimensions? > No, according to me every physical universe must have something physical in it or it wouldn't be a physical universe. > > What in your mind delineates the physical from the mathematical? "Mathematics" is the best language minds have for thinking about the physical universe. And "physical" is anything that is NOT nothing. And "nothing" is anything that is infinite , unbounded , and homogeneous in both space and time. >> >> Cells and particles are physical. >> >> > > > > Would you say it is a particle even when the particles have only 1 bit of > information associated with them "exists in this cell" > Yes I would and that's why you're not talking about nothing, you're talking about something, you're talking about the physical. You use plural words like "particles" and "them". So there is more than one. So neither particles nor cells can be infinite, unbounded, and homogeneous in both space and time. So it can't be nothing. So it must be physical. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
