On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In our present case there is only one 3-1 view and two 1-views. > I agree there are two 1-views, so when you talk about "*THE* 1-view" I don't know which one you mean. >> >> >> The Ohio and Missouri river merge with the Mississippi and so does the >> Ohio, so if I'm going upstream on the Mississippi to the end >> >> from New Orleans what one and only one place will I end up at? > > > > > You mean to the source? > > I don't know what I mean but answer the question anyway, and if you can't then it's a indeterminate question and I have made a new profound discovery in philosophy. >> >> Or is that a silly question? > > > > > Silly question, > Once more I agree, > > You persist in demonstrating how irrational you need to be to sustain your > idea that there is no FPI in self-duplication. > Huh? The problem isn't that there is no FPI in self-duplication, the problem is there are too many. Before the duplication the guy would say from his FPI point of view "I only care about what happens to me, I don't care what happened to that other guy and I predict that after the duplication my attitude will not change". And after the duplication both agree that the words turned out to be true, but unfortunately for your case they would very very strongly disagree on the meanings of the words "I" and "me", one would say those words mean the guy who had been The Helsinki Man but now sees Moscow, but the other insists the words mean the guy who had been The Helsinki Man but now sees Washington. So tell me Bruno, which one is right? >> >> In a world with person duplicating machines* THE* first person does not >> exist. > > > > > Then you die > No, you'd only die if *A* first person does not exist . > > If Aristotle is a Nitwit > There is no "if" about it, Aristotle was a nitwit, Plato too. And although I didn't always feel that way right now thanks to you I'm sick to death with all the ancient Greeks! > > > why do you defend so much Aristotle theology? Ah, I know, because you are > a non agnostic atheist, that is a believer in Aristotle's second god. > Thanks for confirming that non agnostic atheism is a variant of christian > religion, but we already knew this. > Wow, calling a guy known for disliking religion religious, never heard that one before, at least I never heard it before I was 12. Come on Bruno at least put a little effort and variety into your insults, you're just not trying. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
