Not to rehash an old chestnut, but can a bit dance on an infinitesimal? On Sep 13, 2016 10:22 AM, "Stathis Papaioannou" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is emergent. The >> "execution" of the program is timeless and exists in Platonia. So the >> steps of the UD have no duration, they are logically prior to time and >> duration. On the other hand, I think so called "observer moments" must >> have duration in the emergent sense and must overlap. But their relation >> to the UD threads is more aspirational than proven. >> > I think it should be possible to pause and restart at any point a process > underpinning consciousness and leave the stream of consciousness unchanged; > otherwise there would be a radical decoupling of the mental from the > physical. At the limit, this means the process underpinning consciousness > can be cut up into infinitesimals. > > -- > Stathis Papaioannou > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/everything-list/FnHZFBf-Acw/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
