Brent: We've just been through (again) finding there is no contradiction between physics and arithmetic. Your answer seems to be that physics can be an illusion of digital thought, therefore primary physics is otiose. But thought can't be a consequence of physics because....well you just don't see how it could be.
That's a bit quick. I've explained both the reversal and the incompatibility. Then either you don't respond or your response suggests you haven't grasped the point. Care to try again? David On 27/04/2017, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 4/27/2017 12:54 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> If there is a primary physical reality, you have to explain how it >> drives the arithmetical consciousness flux. But how could it do that? >> If it does it in a digitally simulable way, it cannot work (because >> that is done in arithmetic too) > > We've just been through (again) finding there is no contradiction > between physics and arithmetic. Your answer seems to be that physics > can be an illusion of digital thought, therefore primary physics is > otiose. But thought can't be a consequence of physics because....well > you just don't see how it could be. > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
