On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 4:25 AM, Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > you eliminate the key nuance: the fact that the question is about your > 1-self, and not your 3-self. > For a while I considered writing that both " your 1-self " and " your 3-self " should go to a place where the sun don't shine, but then I figured it would be impolite to write that, so I won't. > > All copies have to look at what they have written in the diary > I just don't understand your obsession with that stupid diary. > *>>> And we already have duplication machines, we call them uterus.* >> >> > >> >> Don't be ridiculous. > > > > > That is not ridiculous. > It's Monty Python level ridiculous . Sexual reproduction does not duplicate people, the offspring only have half of a parent's genes and has none of either parent's memories. > > I discovered "computationalism" and its main consequences by looking at > amoebas. Amoebas do not reproduce like people they are asexual, they split into 2 identical individuals and it would be as meaningless to ask which ONE of the TWO is the parent and which ONE is the offspring as it would be to ask after the duplication which ONE of the TWO has the Helsinki man's the "*THE* 1p". John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
