On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 3:43:21 PM UTC, [email protected] wrote: > > If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict > exact outcomes, thus making QM a deterministic theory, would that imply an > INCONSISTENCY in the postulates of QM? TIA. >
Does the Heisenberg or Feynman formulation of QM (Matrix Mechanics and Path Integral respectively) have any issues analogous to the collapse problem of Standard QM (aka the Copenhagen Interpretation)? TIA -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
