On Friday, December 22, 2017 at 4:39:25 AM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On Thursday, November 9, 2017 at 3:43:21 PM UTC, [email protected] > wrote: >> >> If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict >> exact outcomes, thus making QM a deterministic theory, would that imply an >> INCONSISTENCY in the postulates of QM? TIA. >> > > Does the Heisenberg or Feynman formulation of QM (Matrix Mechanics and > Path Integral respectively) have any issues analogous to the collapse > problem of Standard QM (aka the Copenhagen Interpretation)? TIA >
My tentative solution to the wave collapse problem is to trash wave mechanics (which is not Lorentz invariant) and use Heisenberg's Matrix Mechanics. No waves, nothing to collapse. Is this a cop-out? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
