On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 8:46:26 PM UTC-6, stathisp wrote:
>
>
>
> On 19 March 2018 at 12:14, Lawrence Crowell <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 3:51:13 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Lawrence Crowell <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> *> The MH spacetimes have Cauchy horizons that because they pile up 
>>>> geodesics can be a sort of singularity.*
>>>
>>>
>>> That’s not the only thing they have, MH spacetimes also have closed 
>>> timelike curves and logical paradoxes produced by them, one of them being 
>>> the one found by Turing. They also have naked singularities that nobody has 
>>> ever seen the slightest hint of. And if you need to go to as exotic a place 
>>> as the speculative interior of a Black Hole to find a reason why Cryonics 
>>> might not work I am greatly encouraged. 
>>>
>>
>> Not all MH spaces have closed timelike curves.
>>  
>>
>>>
>>> *> The subject of NP-completeness came up because of my conjecture about 
>>>> there being a sort of code associated with a conscious entity that is not 
>>>> computable or if computable is intractable in NP. *
>>>
>>>
>>> NP-completeness is sorta weird and consciousness is sorta weird, but 
>>> other than that is there any reason to think the two things are related?
>>>
>>
>> This seems to be something you are not registering. Classic NP-complete 
>> problems involve cataloging subgraphs and determining the rules for all 
>> subgraphs in a graph. There are other similar combinatoric problems that 
>> are NP complete. A map from a brain to a computer is going to require 
>> knowing how to handle these problems. Quantum computers do not help much.
>>  
>>
>>>
>>> *> It could have some bearing on the ability to emulate consciousness in 
>>>> a computer.*
>>>
>>>
>>> How do you figure that? Both my brain and my computer are made of matter 
>>> that obeys the laws of physics, and matter that obeys the laws of physics 
>>> has never been observed to compute NP-complete problems in polynomial time, 
>>> much less less find the answer to a non-computable question, like “what is 
>>> the 7918th Busy Beaver number?”. 
>>>
>>
>> And for this reason it could be impossible to map brain states into a 
>> computer and capture a person completely. Of course brains and computers 
>> are made of matter. So is a pile of shit also made of matter. Based on what 
>> we know about bacteria and their network communicating by electrical 
>> potentials the pile of shit may have more in the way of consciousness than 
>> a computer. 
>>
>> As for the rest I think a lot of this sort of idea is chasing after some 
>> crazy dream. There is in some ways a problem with doing that. As things 
>> stand now I would not do the upload.  Below is a picture of some aspect of 
>> this. 
>>
>>
>> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-B42zD6RjTlo/Wq8Or4mWXiI/AAAAAAAADSs/rSPOyS5rTfwkhdWkws8ll7Huj6DVNHMqgCLcBGAs/s1600/Why%2Bis%2Bthe%2Bdog%2Bhappier.png>
>>
> Could you say if you think the observable behaviour of the brain (and 
> hence of the person whose muscles are controlled by the brain) could be 
> replaced by a computer, and, if the answer is yes, if you still think it is 
> possible that the consciousness might not be preserved? And if the answer 
> is also yes to the second question, what you think it would be like if your 
> consciousness was changed by replacing part of your brain, but your brain 
> still forced your body to behave in the same way?
>
>
> -- 
> Stathis Papaioannou
>

I really do not know. I will say if it is possible in principle to replace 
the executive parts of the brain with a computer, but where the result 
could be a sort of zombie. There are too many unknowns and unknowns with no 
Bayesian priors, or unknown unknowns. We are in a domain of possibles, 
plausibles and maybe a Jupiter computer-brain. There is so little to go 
with this, and to be honest a lot more possible obstructions I might see 
than realities, that almost nothing can be said with much certainty.

LC

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to