On 6/11/2018 7:12 PM, [email protected] wrote:


On Tuesday, June 12, 2018 at 1:53:42 AM UTC, Brent wrote:



    On 6/11/2018 6:26 PM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote:




    On Monday, June 11, 2018 at 10:57:59 PM UTC, Brent wrote:



        On 6/11/2018 3:22 PM, [email protected] wrote:


                I am not sure this make sense (with the SWE). The
                cat is always isolated, in some sense.

            *
            IMO totally wrong. In fact now you're contradicting what
            you wrote in a recent post. The cat is NEVER ISOLATED,
            VIRTUALLY BY DEFINITION OF WHAT MACRO MEANS. NEVER
            ISOLATED IMPLIES NEVER IN A SUPERPOSITION. AG
            *

        *
        In the real world the cat is never isolated, nor can it be
        isolated insofar as it consists of a huge number of
        particles already entangled with its environment. This is
        the meaning of "macro" ! If you insist on imagining it as
        isolated for your thought experiment, you will generate a
        paradox, as Schroedinger did.  AG*

        Schroedinger obviously chose a cat to emphasize the
        absurdity, but it also makes the analysis hard to think
        about.  Not only is the cat macroscopic, the atomic decay is
        distributed over a continuum. I think it helps to think of a
        simpler experiment in which the atom is just in a box which
        is lined with photographic plates.  So the atom is in a
        superposition of undecayed and decayed and interacted with a
        silver halide atom.  It is clear that it is the interaction
        with the silver halide atom that gets amplified to a
        macroscopic dot of silver which decoheres the system in
        orthogonal "worlds" in which the spot is in different places
        and happens at different times.

        Brent


    *I don't see how a single silver halide atom is amplified to a
    macroscopic dot of silver. *

    That's because you don't bother to look up anything.  You expect
    other people to look it up for you and then explain it to you. 
    Here's Wikipedia, but I'm not explaining it.

*
The original SINGLE atom in your example is not amplified, as I suspected. More important, you ducked the main issue IMO. AG *

As Oliver Heaviside said, "I have given you an explanation.  I'm not obliged to give you an understanding."

Brent


    /Silver halides are used in photographic film and photographic
    paper, including graphic art film and paper, where silver halide
    crystals in gelatin are coated on to a film base, glass or paper
    substrate. The gelatin is a vital part of the emulsion as the
    protective colloid of appropriate physical and chemical
    properties. Gelatin may also contain trace elements (such as
    sulfur) which increase the light sensitivity of the emulsion,
    although modern practice uses gelatin without such components.
    When absorbed by an AgX crystal, photons cause electrons to be
    promoted to a conduction band (de-localized electron orbital with
    higher energy than a valence band) which can be attracted by a
    sensitivity speck, which is a shallow electron trap, which may be
    a crystalline defect or a cluster of silver sulfide, gold, other
    trace elements (dopant), or combination thereof, and then combined
    with an interstitial silver ion to form silver metal speck.[1]//
    //
    //When a silver halide crystal is exposed to light, a sensitivity
    speck on the surface of the crystal is turned into a small speck
    of metallic silver (these comprise the invisible or latent image).
    If the speck of silver contains approximately four or more atoms,
    it is rendered developable - meaning that it can undergo
    development which turns the entire crystal into metallic silver.

    /Brent/
    /
    *Going back to my analysis, I think I have shown the fallacy of
    using a macro entities in a superposition (since they can never
    be isolated). But this is the starting point of decoherence
    theory, as exemplified by the wf Bruce recently presented for a
    spin 1/2 measurement (where the apparatus, observer and remaining
    environment appear in the superposition). AG*
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
    To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <javascript:>.
    Visit this group at
    https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
    <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
    <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to