On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 8:33:23 PM UTC, Jason wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 2:50 PM, <agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 1:11:23 PM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 7:42 AM, <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Monday, June 18, 2018 at 12:30:02 PM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 7:04 AM, <agrays...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> *No "but's" about it! That's the 800 pound gorilla in the room that 
>>>>>> Many Worlder's studiously ignore. There's no proposed mechanism to 
>>>>>> explain 
>>>>>> the copying! They will appeal to the mathematics, which they rely on 
>>>>>> uncritically. But it's obvious that such reliance can lead to ridiculous 
>>>>>> results if taken literally. For example, Maxwell's equations have plane 
>>>>>> wave solutions, but plane waves don't exist! Think about what a plane 
>>>>>> wave 
>>>>>> is; all peaks and troughs extend to infinity, advancing along an 
>>>>>> infinite 
>>>>>> plane in every direction. And No, I don't have a classical view of 
>>>>>> reality, 
>>>>>> but neither do I fall in love with BS. AG*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Rather thank think of it like copying, think of it like this:
>>>>>
>>>>> - When a photon hits a semi-silvered mirror, it splits and takes two 
>>>>> paths.  Now, both the photon's position and its direction are 
>>>>> multi-valued.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Does it split into two photons, each having the same energy as the 
>>>> original photon?*
>>>>
>>>
> It's one photon, with a property that is multi-valued.
>  
>
>> * If so, where does the added energy come from.*
>>>>
>>>
> N/A - it's still just one photon
>  
>
>> * Or does it split in half?*
>>>>
>>>
> N/A - it's still just one photon
>  
>
>>
>>>> * Or does it take two possible paths, not both paths simultaneously? 
>>>> TIA, AG*
>>>>
>>>
> If it's velocity property is multi-valued, you could say it follows more 
> than one path at the same time.
> But this is not necessary the case. The superposition might be in terms of 
> polarization, rather than its velocity, and in that case it's only takes 
> one path.
>  
> Jason
>

*So it takes one of two paths, presumably with a 50% probability. How does 
this result in copies, of the photon or possibly entire universes?  Sounds 
like you're grasping at straws to explain the copying mechanism. AG*

>  
>
>>
>>> Think of it being only a change to the photon's properties. 
>>>
>>
>> *If you are able, and have the time, please answer my question above, 
>> specifically. TIA, AG*
>>  
>>
>>> It's not really two photons, it's a single photon, now holding multiple 
>>> values for some of its properties (which include velocity, position, 
>>> frequency, polarization, etc.)  After interacting with a semi-silvered 
>>> mirror, the same thing always happens to a photon, it takes on multiple 
>>> values for its velocity.
>>>
>>> Jason
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> - We can use full-silvered mirrors to redirect this "multi-valued" 
>>>>> photon such that both of its positions will converge (while nonetheless 
>>>>> traveling in different directions on that intercept course)
>>>>> - We can place an electron at that point of interception, such that 
>>>>> this multi-velocity photon interacts with and strikes this electron 
>>>>> (which 
>>>>> right now only has one position and zero velocity)
>>>>> - When the multi-velocity photon hits the electron, the electron now 
>>>>> has two velocities (you could view it as in one case, it was hit from 
>>>>> below, and in another case it was hit from the side).
>>>>>
>>>>> So we see a clear case, where a photon, being in a super-position of 
>>>>> states, when it interacts with an electron, it's multiple states transfer 
>>>>> to that electron such that it now ends up in a super position, and will 
>>>>> have different positions and velocities over time.  Anything that 
>>>>> interacts 
>>>>> with that electron, or doesn't interact with it will also become 
>>>>> multi-valued.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let's say there is a detection screen to the right of the electron, 
>>>>>  the multi-valued electron interacts with the atoms in the detection 
>>>>> screen. Because the electron's position is multi-valued, and only one of 
>>>>> the electron's velocity's intercept the screen, the atoms in the 
>>>>> detection 
>>>>> screen also enter a super position, of having interacted with the 
>>>>> electron 
>>>>> and having not interacted with the electron (the upward moving electron 
>>>>> velocity misses the screen).  So now there is a superposition of states 
>>>>> in 
>>>>> the room where a flash flash of light from the screen has occurred, and 
>>>>> where no flash of light on the screen has occurred.
>>>>>
>>>>> You can continue this example forward until you end up with yourself 
>>>>> in the room with two different brains, one where it is encoding memories 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> having seen a flash of light and another where it did not.  Nothing 
>>>>> special 
>>>>> is itnroduced by the observer, the observer is, afterall, just a 
>>>>> collection 
>>>>> of particles, each of which may or may not enter a superposition of 
>>>>> states, 
>>>>> depending on whether or not they interact with any particle that is in a 
>>>>> super position.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is how the "copying" works.  It's just state transfer.  Think of 
>>>>> it as:
>>>>>
>>>>> x is in a superposition of +3 and - 3.  In other words x = ±3
>>>>> y is 5
>>>>>
>>>>> y interacts with x as follows: y = y * x
>>>>>
>>>>> What this means is y = 5 * (±3)
>>>>>
>>>>> Now y is multi-valued, in a superposition of 15 and -15.
>>>>>
>>>>> No magic full scale copying of entire universes.  It's just particle 
>>>>> states can be multi-valued, and anything that interacts with a 
>>>>> multi-valued 
>>>>> particle is effected by it being multi-valued.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jason
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to