On 18 June 2018 at 04:57, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/17/2018 4:43 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>>
>> On 17 June 2018 at 13:26,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sunday, June 17, 2018 at 10:15:05 AM UTC, Jason wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 12:12 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   why do you prefer the MWI compared to the Transactional
>>>>> Interpretation?
>>>>> I see both as absurd. so I prefer to assume the wf is just epistemic,
>>>>> and/or
>>>>> that we have some holes in the CI which have yet to be resolved. AG
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. It's the simplest theory: "MWI" is just the Schrodinger equation,
>>>> nothing else. (it doesn't say Schrodinger's equation only applies
>>>> sometimes,
>>>> or only at certain scales)
>>>>
>>>> 2. It explains more while assuming less (it explains the appearance of
>>>> collapse, without having to assume it, thus is preferred by Occam's
>>>> razor)
>>>>
>>>> 3. Like every other successful physical theory, it is linear, reversible
>>>> (time-symmetric), continuous, deterministic and does not require faster
>>>> than
>>>> light influences nor retrocausalities
>>>>
>>>> 4. Unlike single-universe or epistemic interpretations, "WF is real"
>>>> with
>>>> MWI is the only way we know how to explain the functioning of quantum
>>>> computers (now up to 51 qubits)
>>>>
>>>> 5. Unlike copenhagen-type theories, it attributes no special physical
>>>> abilities to observers or measurement devices
>>>>
>>>> 6. Most of all, theories of everything that assume a reality containing
>>>> all possible observers and observations lead directly to laws/postulates
>>>> of
>>>> quantum mechanics (see Russell Standish's Theory of Nothing, Chapter 7
>>>> and
>>>> Appendix D).
>>>>
>>>> Given #6, we should revise our view. It is not MWI and QM that should
>>>> convince us of many worlds, but rather the assumption of many worlds (an
>>>> infinite and infinitely varied reality) that gives us, and explains all
>>>> the
>>>> weirdness of QM. This should overwhelmingly convince us of MWI-type
>>>> everything theories over any single-universe interpretation of quantum
>>>> mechanics, which is not only absurd, but completely devoid of
>>>> explanation.
>>>> With the assumption of a large reality, QM is made explainable and
>>>> understandable: as a theory of observation within an infinite reality.
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>
>>>
>>> You forgot #7. It asserts multiple, even infinite copies of an observer,
>>> replete with memories, are created when an observer does a simple quantum
>>> experiment. So IMO the alleged "cure" is immensely worse than the
>>> disease,
>>> CI, that is, just plain idiotic. AG
>>
>> It is important to make the distinction between our intuition and
>> common sense and actual formal reasoning. The former can guide the
>> latter very successfully, but the history of science teaches us that
>> this is not always the case. You don't provide an argument, you just
>> present your gut feeling as if it were the same thing as irrefutable
>> fact.
>
>
> I think Scott Aaronson has the right attitude toward this:
>
> https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=326

Thanks, interesting point by Aaronson. I will make a mental note of it
and move on :)
To be clear, I am not claiming "MWI is correct". I don't know if it
is. Gun to my head, I would bet on it, that's all.
Libertarianism, as well as communism, are silver-bullet ideologies
that ignore large aspects of human nature.

Telmo.

>
> Brent
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to