> On 28 Jul 2018, at 00:12, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 7/27/2018 1:58 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 22:48, Brent Meeker <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> On 7/27/2018 11:21 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 20:18, Brent Meeker <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 7/26/2018 11:31 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Le ven. 27 juil. 2018 à 00:10, <[email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 9:59:49 PM UTC, stathisp wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jul 2018 at 2:08 am, <[email protected] <>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 11:30:11 AM UTC, [email protected] <> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday, July 26, 2018 at 11:24:42 AM UTC, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>>> I still don't get it why some people prefer insulting other people and 
>>>> their ideas instead of discussing or just stay with their own thoughts and 
>>>> just say they disagree... What do you gain by saying they are insane, 
>>>> stupid or whatever?
>>>> 
>>>> It just looks to me childish. So stop doing this, stop writing in 70pt 
>>>> size red fonts... It's a disfavor to your arguments. 
>>>> 
>>>> Quentin 
>>>> 
>>>> In fact, I DO think it's a mental illness. AG 
>>>> 
>>>> It's not just wrong, but a gross dysfunction of judgment. Joe the Plumber 
>>>> goes into a lab or his closet, shoots a single electron at a slit, and by 
>>>> so doing creates uncountable                                               
>>>>       universes, all with copies of himself, replete with his memories. 
>>>> Sure. AG
>>>> 
>>>> You may as well protest on the same basis that the universe can’t be so 
>>>> wastefully large.
>>>> 
>>>> I don't see how that follows. Unfortunately, one cannot PROVE that the 
>>>> many worlds allegedly implied by the MWI interpretation don't exist, which 
>>>> is why I insist the True Believers are judgment impaired. Do you really 
>>>> believe that trivial actions by mere humans, accidents of evolution, can 
>>>> create entire universes? AG.  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> No, because that's not what happens, at every interactions, universes 
>>>> split/differentiate... Humans or not. 
>>> 
>>> I think that's a misleading way to look at it.  First, the vector in 
>>> Hilbert space representing the state of the universe just rotates around. 
>>> It never "splits".  What we refer to as "splitting" is the projection onto 
>>> a plane in the Hilbert space that corresponds to a certain "classical" 
>>> world.  Second, this "classical" world plane is not sharply defined.  
>>> Almost all interactions do not make any difference to it, i.e. they only 
>>> make Planck sized changes to the action and correspondingly tiny tilts to 
>>> the projective plane.  The myriad atomic interactions in your body don't 
>>> make any classical difference.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Yet if QM is the theory of reality, there is no classical world that exists 
>>> ontologicaly... So makes no difference to who, what? 
>> 
>> That the ontology of the world is quantum is a theory.  The theory is 
>> derived from and supported by evidence which is stuff experienced by you and 
>> me.  Our experience of the world is "classical" (notice I used scare quotes, 
>> as I did above).  Bohr was right when he observed that science and knowledge 
>> are only possible in a "classical" world; a world in which records exist and 
>> observers can agree on them and we do not observe macroscopic superpositions.
>> 
>> 
>> If QM is reality, microscopic change are parallel realities even if your 
>> conscious state is compatible, span over them...Hence computationalism. 
> 
> IF QM is reality...or is it just our best current model of reality.  That's 
> part of my point.  Ontologies come from theories, which come from 
> epistemology.

The belief in this or that ontology comes from epistemology. By definition of 
ontology, it is real even without any observer or conscious being. I guess that 
this is what you mean, if not you get close to solipsism or subjective idealism.

Bruno


> 
> Brent
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to