On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 12:34:13 AM UTC, Brent wrote: > > What can be inferred always depends on what you take as premises. If you > start from the Hilbert space formulation of QM or an equivalent formulation* > and you premise that there is a probability interpretation of a state*, > then Gleason's theorem tells you that the Born rule provides the unique > probability values. > > Brent >
*So to get Born's Rule, Bruno would have to assume a huge amount IN ADDITION TO ARITHMETIC. I don't buy it. AG * > > On 11/29/2018 10:23 AM, agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote: > > *Regardless of rules of arithmetic and mathematical logic, I simply don't > believe that something like Born's Rule can be inferred without actually > observing a quantum interference pattern. AG* > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
