On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 12:34:13 AM UTC, Brent wrote: > > What can be inferred always depends on what you take as premises. If you > start from the Hilbert space formulation of QM or an equivalent formulation* > and you premise that there is a probability interpretation of a state*, > then Gleason's theorem tells you that the Born rule provides the unique > probability values. > > Brent >
*So to get Born's Rule, Bruno would have to assume a huge amount IN ADDITION TO ARITHMETIC. I don't buy it. AG * > > On 11/29/2018 10:23 AM, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: > > *Regardless of rules of arithmetic and mathematical logic, I simply don't > believe that something like Born's Rule can be inferred without actually > observing a quantum interference pattern. AG* > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
