On Monday, December 3, 2018 at 11:59:21 AM UTC-6, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 3, 2018 at 9:12:54 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2 Dec 2018, at 14:45, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 6:52:38 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 30 Nov 2018, at 17:44, Philip Thrift <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 6:39:19 AM UTC-6, [email protected] 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, November 30, 2018 at 9:13:29 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *This may be a simplistic pov, but since there was IMO no Original 
>>>>> Sin, there was no need for a Sacrifice for its forgiveness. Under this 
>>>>> view, Christianity is overwhelmingly an illusion. And since Theology 
>>>>> seems 
>>>>> to be primarily an extended argument about the historical history and 
>>>>> truths about Christianity, it too is essentially worthless; an extended 
>>>>> wrangling over nothing. AG *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That comes from the 1500 years of brainwashing. I use theology in the 
>>>>> sense of Plato, not the Gospel. Only atheists believe in JC, 
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Really? It seems you never met any Christians on a personal level. If 
>>>> you did, you'd see how uninformed you are. AG*
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> except for the TV evangelist, which are arguably con men.
>>>>> That was the goal of the Christian after 529. To make us forget that 
>>>>> the original question of the greeks was about the existence of a 
>>>>> (primary) 
>>>>> physical universe. God exist by definition: it is, by definition, the 
>>>>> truth 
>>>>> we intuit to be larger than ourselves.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *I really doubt the question about the nature of matter has been 
>>>> forgotten. AG *
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> There is no truth outside of language, and matter's just another word 
>>> for nothing left to lose.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Language have no relation with truth a priori. Theories might have. 
>>> Semantics are truth “by definition”, by relativising it to the notion of 
>>> model/reality.
>>>
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>>
>>  
>>
>> *Rorty* is right, I think: Better not to use the word "truth" at all.
>>
>>
>> In any argument, we cannot invoke “truth", nor “real”, nor “god” etc. All 
>> this for the same basic reason which is justified in the Mechanist theory 
>> by their provable non definability (à-la Tarski).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> It's just "justification". Or "judgment" (a type-theoretic term).
>>
>>
>> But that is close to the solipsist move. The fact that we cannot define 
>> truth does not entail that some notion of truth does not make sense. In 
>> particular, Peano arithmetic can already define an infinity of 
>> approximation of truth, namely sigma_i and pi_i truth (the truth of the 
>> sentences will a finite and fixed number of quantifier, as opposed to 
>> finite sentences with an arbitrary finite number of quantifier).
>>
>> We can invoke truth, but we can develop meta-discourse relating truth to 
>> theories, like we cannot invoke our own consciousness does not prevent us 
>> to try theories about it. 
>> It is a bit like “I cannot study my own brain”, but I can still infer 
>> some theories of my brain by looking at the brain of others and then 
>> assuming that I am not different.
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>  
> A different perspective (!) of "truth" comes from - vs. PA (Peano 
> arithmetic) - *PLT* (programming language theory - the legacy to a large 
> extent of John C. Reynolds [ 
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_C._Reynolds - who was originally a 
> theoretical physicist ], and sort of in parallel the whole type-theory 
> gang). Rather than an external "god-like" notion of truth, truth is in the 
> programming.
>
> - pt
>
>
>
I should also mention (in addition to John Reynolds) Peter Landin 
[ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Landin ] (who looked a lot like 
Richard Deacon [ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Deacon_(actor)  - *The 
Dick Van Dyke Show*, *Leave It To Beaver* ].


- pt

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to