On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 7:28 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:

>>>> If the creation of the inflaton required conditions that existed when
>>>> the universe was 10^-44 seconds old and inflation had decayed away when it
>>>> was 10^-35 seconds old then the particle associated with the inflation
>>>> field would have decayed away too and we wouldn't expect to see it today
>>>> even at places where we can reproduce conditions the universe was in when
>>>> it was 10^-17 seconds old. If it still existed it would still be strongly
>>>> connected to regular matter but we could not detect it but the universe
>>>> could and would still be expanding at an exponential rate and galaxies
>>>> stars and planets would not exist, we couldn't detect it because we
>>>> wouldn't exist either.
>>>>
>>>
>>> *>>> Very good reasons for saying that no such field or particle exists,
>>> or have ever existed.*
>>>
>>
>> >>Or has ever existed? How do you figure that?
>>
>
> *> If they had ever existed, they would couple strongly to ordinary
> matter, and we would see such inflatons now.*
>

Helium-5 was certainly created in the Big Bang  but we don't see any of it
in nature today because it has a half life of 7.6*10^-22 seconds. And
if inflatons
were created in the Big Bang  we wouldn't expect to see them in nature
today because they had a half life of about 10^-35 seconds.


> > *There are no such things as such quantum fluctuations: *
>

Quantum Fluctuation
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_fluctuation>

> >> We are talking about the most non-local thing we can observe, the Cosmic
>> Microwave Background Radiation.Before inflation all parts of the CMB
>> were locally connected and reached thermal equilibrium, but even so due to
>> quantum variation you could have found slight differences in temperature if
>> you had a sensitive enough thermometer and looked at a small enough volume.
>>
>
>  > *Collections of particles in thermal equilibrium still show random
> fluctuations on the smallest scales -- Boltzmann distribution and all that.*
>

It's a bit silly to ignore quantum mechanics and try to use classical
thermodynamics at a time before inflation when things must have been close
to the Planck Temperature of 10^32 degrees Kelvin.

John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to