> Il 20 gennaio 2019 alle 12.56 [email protected] ha scritto: > > > > On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 10:46:01 AM UTC, scerir wrote: > > > > > > > > [BRUNO writes] It has a non null amplitude of probability of being > > here and there at the same time, like having a non null amplitude of > > probability of going through each slit in the two slits experience. If not, > > you can’t explain the inference patterns, especially in the photon > > self-interference. > > > > > > Interesting to point out that, in the two-slit, it is possible to > > have interference even when there is just one slit open (and the other slit > > shut, and viceversa, with some appropriate frequence). In this case it > > seems that the two amplitudes cannot interfere. > > > > - Leonard Mandel : "On the Possibility of Observing Interference > > Effects with Light Beams Divided by a Shutter", J.Opt.Soc.Amer., > > 49, (1959), 931. > > - R.M. Sillitto, Catherine Wykes: "An Interference Experiment With > > Light Beams Modulated In Anti-Phase By An Electro-Optic Shutter", > > Physics Letters, 39-A-4, (1972), 333-334. > > > > > > Isn't this called diffraction? AG >
No, they show it is interference > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > mailto:[email protected] . > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > mailto:[email protected] . > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
