On Sunday, January 20, 2019 at 10:46:01 AM UTC, scerir wrote: > > > [BRUNO writes] It has a non null amplitude of probability of being here > and there at the same time, like having a non null amplitude of probability > of going through each slit in the two slits experience. If not, you can’t > explain the inference patterns, especially in the photon self-interference. > > > Interesting to point out that, in the two-slit, it is possible to have > interference even when there is just one slit open (and the other slit > shut, and viceversa, with some appropriate frequence). In this case it > seems that the two amplitudes cannot interfere. > > - Leonard Mandel : "On the Possibility of Observing Interference Effects > with Light Beams Divided by a Shutter", J.Opt.Soc.Amer., > 49, (1959), 931. > - R.M. Sillitto, Catherine Wykes: "An Interference Experiment With Light > Beams Modulated In Anti-Phase By An Electro-Optic Shutter", > Physics Letters, 39-A-4, (1972), 333-334. >
*Isn't this called diffraction? AG * -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
