So Feyerabend can't tell ISIS from NASA or the National Academy of Science from the Papacy.

Brent

On 6/24/2019 10:09 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:



"Feyerabend felt that science started as a liberating movement, but over time it had become increasingly dogmatic and rigid, and therefore had become increasingly an ideology and despite its successes science had started to attain some oppressive features, and it was not possible [any longer] to come up with an unambiguous way to distinguish science from religion."

/Epistemological anarchism/
From Wikipedia

@philipthrift


On Monday, June 24, 2019 at 6:04:04 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:

    I think one could be most on the mark by calling this "how bad
    money chases out good money." I joined this list last fall, and in
    the last couple of months it seems to have fallen over to various
    humbugs promoting nonsense. these threads of late have degenerated
    into pure rubbish, bad thinking chasing out good thinking.

    LC

    On Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 10:46:37 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:

        I changed the title of this thread, I don't even know what the
        old one means.

        On Sun, Jun 23, 2019 at 8:31 AM Bruno Marchal
        <[email protected]> wrote:

            > /the natural transplant you mention might be the result of
            an analog, continuous process./It would make a difference
            if all the decimals plays a role in consciousness.


        Even if you ignore the fact that it has been experimentally
        proven that Bell's Inequality is violated and you claim there
        if a difference between one Hydrogen atom and another, that is
        to say somewhere along that infinite sequence of digits there
        is a difference, what you say makes no sense. The atoms in my
        brain HAVE been replaced and yet I know for a FACT I have
        survived; I *don't* knowfor a fact that the same is true for
        you but I think it's reasonable to assume it is. So even if
        there is something analog going on inside an atom, if we're
        talking about consciousness and survival it's irrelevant.

            />Of course, Darwin theory of evolution would become
            inconsistent, but logically, we cannot exclude the
            possibility/


        If a mathematical statement, even a well formed grammatically
        correct one, contradicts a well established observation then
        it would be logical to conclude the statement does not
        correspond with reality; after all every language can write
        fiction as well as nonfiction.  The fiction could be fun to
        read and the very best might even have some sort of vague
        poetic relationship to a truth, but there is not a literal
        correspondence to reality.

                >> Even if a Hydrogen atom has some secret analog
                process going on inside of it when one atom gets
                replaced by another atom, that is to say when one
                analog process gets replaced by another analog
                process, I *STILL* survive.


            /> That is the mechanist assumption. You can truncate the
            infinite decimal expansion in the analog process running a
            brain./


        It's not an assumption it's a *OBSERVATION*! Atoms in my brain
        have been replaced many many times and yet my consciousness
        has continued. My only *ASSUMPTION* is thatyou are like me and
        are also conscious.

                >> So that hypothetical secret mysterious analog process
                is the Hydrogen atom's business not mine, it has
                nothing to do with me.


            /> Assuming that you substitution level is above the
            truncation of the decimals used in the atom. But a non
            computationalist can assert that his consciousness
            requires all decimals.
            /


        Then the non computationalist must logically conclude that he
        is not conscious. I thought solipsists were bad but at least
        they thought they were conscious even if nobody else was, but
        your non computationalist doesn't even think he is conscious.
        How a non conscious person is able to think of anything I will
        leave as an exercise for the reader.

                    >>> In which theory?

                >> In the very controversial theory that says if I have
                observed X then I have observed X.


            />You cannot observe a philosophical assumption.
            /


        You can observe that a philosophical assumption is dead wrong,
        such as the philosophical assumption that an infinite string
        of digits in an analog process is always needed to continue
        consciousness.

                >> Proof is not the ultimate, direct experience outranks
                it, and I have direct experience I have survived
despite numerous brain transplant operations.
            > /Yes, and that is good for you,//but/ [...]


        But nothing! It's good enough for me to say yes to the doctor
        and it's good enough for me to say yes to being frozen. And if
        your experience has been similar to mine, if your
        consciousness has also continued despite your many brain
        transplant operations, and if you are a true fan of logic,
        then you must conclude it's good enough for you too.

            /> Personal experience is not available when doing science,/


        True, and that is exactly why no consciousness theory ever
        devised is scientific, and none every will be. But theories
        about how intelligence works are most certainly scientific.

                >> It doesn't matter if I can communicate my reason for
                saying yes to the doctor (or yes to being frozen). I
                have no obligation to justify my actions to you or
                anybody; based on the evidence I have at my command it
is the logical thing to do.

            > /Personally, perhaps. Not sure about the guy above, though./


        I'm not sure about the other guy either, he might be a zombie
        for all I know, everybody except me might be, all I know for
        certain is I'm not. The other guy is going to have to make his
        own decision, I can't help him, nobody can.

        John K Clark

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/24ee370b-afd9-495e-b203-7c1118d5d717%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/24ee370b-afd9-495e-b203-7c1118d5d717%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fa1ee5a5-b923-ebeb-985b-a10c99bfc0a5%40verizon.net.

Reply via email to