On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 10:45 AM Bruno Marchal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > *When we prove that there is no biggest prime number, we don’t make the > prime numbers being infinite. There was no biggest prime number "well > before” Euclid proved it. * > Euclid proved that *IF* numbers have nothing to do with physics then there are infinitely many primes. But that's a big if. *> Any way, if you believe that stars are made of primitive matter, then > you become inconsistent when saying “yes” to a digitalist doctor. * > Neither I or the "digitalist" (formerly digital) doctor give a damn if "stars are made of primitive matter" because IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. >> I don't know what it is today but Just a few days ago in the language of > Brunospeak a belief in Mechanism mente saying "yes" to the digital > > *> Not digital. But “digitalist”. Unless you say only yes to a doctor who > has itself already say yes to a doctor.* > Well now, that clears things up beautifully! > what is the role of your primitive matter in consciousness > I don't care. My answer to the digital or digitized or digitalist doctor has not changed, it's still yes. That means the day before yesterday I believed in mechanism according to the Brunospeak meaning of the word, but today I may or may not believe in mechanism, I'm not sure because my Brunospeak is not up to date. *> **(and what is your “primitive matter”, incidentally, can you give a > theory of it,* > Nope. John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv3vQ_JQY4JWN6ENPGzztEhnqL1ehvaw3go%3DiRbe4THpcA%40mail.gmail.com.
